Comparison of Access Control Systems: Wiegand, OSDP, and IoT Solutions

Introduction

In today’s rapidly evolving security landscape, the shift from traditional access control systems to integrated, IT-compatible solutions is crucial for enhancing both operational efficiency and security. The Wiegand protocol, a staple in access control since the late 1970s, has been favored for its simplicity and reliability. However, its limitations in integrating with modern digital environments have prompted the emergence of more advanced alternatives. The Open Supervised Device Protocol (OSDP) and Internet of Things (IoT) solutions are now at the forefront, offering enhanced compatibility with IT networks and a range of advanced features.

System Comparison: Integration and Architecture

• Wiegand: As a traditional protocol, Wiegand faces significant integration challenges with IT networks, often requiring both hardware and software modifications. Its architecture centralizes decision-making in controllers, which can lead to vulnerabilities if the controller fails.
• OSDP: OSDP represents a more modern approach, facilitating IT infrastructure integration through an IP-based system. However, it still requires specialized software for effective communication with IT devices. Like Wiegand, it relies on centralized decision-making.
• IoT: IoT solutions mark a significant leap forward with embedded processing capabilities, enabling these devices to operate independently or alongside centralized management systems. Being inherently web-based, IoT devices allow access through standard web browsers, offering unparalleled flexibility and integration ease.

Security and Performance

Hacking Vulnerability:

• Wiegand: Vulnerable to hacking within minutes.
• OSDP: Offers a high level of security, with theoretical breach times extending over a billion years.
• IoT: Exceptionally secure, with encryption standards that promise security for trillions of years.

Data Transmission:

• Wiegand and OSDP: Limited by outdated technology standards.
• IoT: Supports high-speed data transmission, currently reaching up to 10Gbps.

Installation and Maintenance

• Both Wiegand and OSDP systems require extensive installation time and specialized on-site maintenance.
• In contrast, IoT solutions can be installed within an hour and are easily maintained through online management platforms, significantly reducing downtime and maintenance costs.

Scalability and Reliability

• Wiegand and OSDP systems face scalability limitations due to their infrastructure requirements.
• IoT devices offer effortless integration into existing networks, supporting immediate expansion without geographical constraints. Their plug-and-play nature minimizes potential points of failure, thereby enhancing overall system reliability.

ESG and NetZero 2050

• By reducing the need for additional hardware integration and cabling, particularly the cables connecting Wiegand and OSDP readers to controllers, an estimated 2Kg of CO2e can be saved per 100 meters of cables. This small change contributes significantly to environmental sustainability goals, aligning with the NetZero 2050 initiative.

Conclusion

The comparison of Wiegand, OSDP, and IoT solutions reveals a clear trend towards the adoption of IoT in access control systems. IoT’s superior integration capabilities, robust security features, and operational efficiencies make it the ideal choice for modern, dynamic environments. While Wiegand and OSDP systems still have their place in certain applications, the agility, scalability, and future-proof nature of IoT solutions position them as the preferred choice in today’s digitally transformed world.

About Actatek and Jakin

Actatek is the manufacturer and intellectual property owner of the Actatek brand’s edge AI IoT devices. Jakin develops the AMS on-premise and cloud multi-application integrated platform to manage all Actatek edge AI IoT devices. Both Actatek and Jakin are wholly owned by the same group, ensuring seamless integration and development across their products and services.